This is the first result of a Google Images search for "uncompromising beauty."
That's right -- it is the Excalibur 5, a window so convenient to wash that it truly is a beautiful thing. While grit and grime flit from this window like dandruff, the mind is set free to fret about other aesthetic matters. Such as the dangerous prevalence of order. Or the madness of having your wishes realized.
Now, changing the tense to create a non-existent word, "uncompromised beauty" nevertheless conjures the mien of courage precedent to any enduring existence. And indeed we find this:
This is no mere landscape though. It is framed by an advert which offers that "You Need Not Sacrifice Convenience For the Uncompromised Beauty This Parcel Presents!"
Google seems to have a curious privilege for confabulating beauty with "convenience" in one sense or another. It isn't clear which. Though in both examples it seems to be the convenience of having the time to think about things other than these beautiful things. In which case beauty would exist only to negate the things in which it is vested (things or concepts), and therefore exist effectively nowhere.
This is different from ascribing an "essence" to beauty as that which is uncompromising and uncompromisable. Essences have no home by definition, so perhaps it is unsurprising that they wouldn't find one in Google either. However, the twinge of melancholy in every beautiful object is that it is merely a trace or shadow of the beautiful essential potential. As a search engine, Google is a concept of concepts to which one would not be faulted for turning to divine hidden patterns. Can it be trusted to do so? In this case, Google seems to be up to something. There's a pattern displayed in these two images that seems to promote the value of convenience as pre-eminent to the essence of beauty. If we then search for the un-essence of beauty, what will we find?
Defining by negation, "compromised beauty" ranks this as the most representative image:
According to its parent website, this is an image from the 1990 Indian film "Haseena Atombomb". It is reviewed as "a masterpiece of gutter-trash-art. It is a breathtaking slice of the bizarre and the macabre as well as a searing sociopolitical indictment and commentary on a society gone haywire." The plot includes the following episode: "The film switches back to the present, and Atomic, having been rescued by Tubby on the emaciated Pegasus clone skips off homeward to enjoy her wedding to local stud, Cool Joe and village law enforcer who is one hell of a fellow. He also goes for white when it comes to transport - the four legged kind that is. Just as the marriage is about to be consummated the bliss is shattered as the vengeful goons who had been thrashed by Tubby return to satisfy their "animal lust"."
I'd say inverse Google is bang on. Atomically so.
April 24th, 2008
/ 0 Comments / Tags: no help from Google, priorities